Setback for the gray wolf

gray wolf pups In a great disappointment to all environmental groups and a reminder that the battle to save nature’s  predators must continue, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Friday he was upholding the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to remove gray wolves from the federal endangered list in the Northern Rockies and the western Great Lakes.

Wolves would remain a federally protected species in Wyoming, because the state’s law and management plans were not strong enough, he said. Management of the wolf numbers will now be turned over to state agencies in Montana and Idaho and parts of Washington, Oregon and Utah, in addition to the Great Lakes states of Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

The Obama administration reviewed the Bush decision , but Salazar concluded that dropping the wolf from the list was justified by its strong comeback in the two regions, which together have a population of nearly 5,600 wolves. “The recovery of the gray wolf throughout significant portions of its historic range is one of the great success stories of the Endangered Species Act,” he said in a conference call from Washington, D.C.

So comeback now means open season for hunting them and a huge setback for the balance in nature.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, the California Democrat who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, questioned the move and promised to investigate whether Salazar’s decision is consistent with the Endangered Species act. She said her staff would gather information to determine whether the move met the “letter and the spirit” of the law in regards to the Endangered Species act. Courts have overturned previous attempts to remove the wolf from the list, and future legal battles appear likely.

wolf-in-moon-lightEnvironmental groups will sue trying to save the estimated 1,600 wolves in the Northern Rockies. A federal judge in Missoula, Mont., last year sided with the groups when they filed a lawsuit saying the animal’s long-term survival remained at risk, particularly in Wyoming. Thus the government in January 2009 decided to leave out Wyoming from its plan.

“What we had hoped was the new administration would have taken a deep breath and evaluate the science,” said Jamie Rappaport Clark, vice president of Defenders of Wildlife and a former Fish and Wildlife Service director under President Bill Clinton.

“Whether it’s (Bush Interior Secretary Dirk) Kempthorne or Secretary Salazar, the concern remains the same,” she added. “It’s the same plan that I fear doesn’t protect the wolf’s long-term sustainability.”

Wyoming’s attorney general previously said his state probably would challenge the latest plan in court.

The Fish and Wildlife Service has been unable to agree on a protection plan with Wyoming, which had sought a “predator zone” covering almost 90 percent of the state where wolves could be shot on sight.

“The scientists at the Fish and Wildlife Service do not feel the recovery plan is adequate in Wyoming,” Salazar said. He said his department would work with Wyoming to “come up with a joint way forward.”

The wolf hunt is on

The northern Rocky Mountain wolf segment includes all of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, the eastern third of Washington and Oregon and a small part of north-central Utah.

Idaho and Montana already have crafted plans for public hunts to keep wolf populations in check. There are no immediate plans for hunts in the western Great Lakes, which has nearly 4,000 wolves. Idaho Gov. C.L. Butch Otter on Friday repeated his desire to get the first available wolf hunting tag in the state so he can try to shoot one of the animals. “The fish and game population is really counting on a robust population of trophy animals to maintain that part of our economy,” he said.

Wolves elsewhere in the Lower 48 states remain on the endangered list.

Save the Rocky Mountain gray wolves.

Resources

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. Leslie said,

    March 8, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Delisting is not a ‘plan’. Wolves are a highly organized social system. Simply killing and limiting the numbers of wolves will not solve the ‘problem’ of unwanted predations. Delisting should be a complete plan that also requires cattle ranchers to put in place certain plans, such as shepherding, non-grazing areas when elk are present, mgmt. of open grazing lands (no open grazing in areas of intense wolf populations) and other measures. I am disappointed in Obama. Obviously he knows very little about the West.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: